Only by fearing the profession can we truly see the problem
Some forces who always want to "subvert" seem to want to revolutionize the manufacturing industry - but they know very little about the manufacturing industry, and do not know where the subversion comes from. Do we need no flour or stuffing to make dumplings? Mineral water is not bottled? Or is the mask free of meltblown cloth? Or, your printing accuracy is higher, and people's accuracy is+/-0.1mm. You have subverted it, reaching 0.01mm. I want to tell you that it is useless. Overqualified. People always say they want to subvert it, but they don't think of where to subvert it? When asked about the details, it seems that we don't know what to say. It seems that it is not easy to exceed our cognition. If we can't exceed our cognition of manufacturing, subversion will not happen - who can make us see?
Industrial software
Look at all manufacturing with mathematics, and you will see through the essence of things without being confused by concepts, or understand how to obtain the source of innovation.
The unique power of mathematics comes from its universality. The universality of mathematics lies in that "all phenomena have a physical structure, and this physical structure can only be expressed in mathematics", and "the deployment of nature is written in mathematical words".
In this complicated world, mathematics is like a "mirror". If you cannot describe, build models, and test and verify in mathematics, it is false.
Concept Interpretation Concept Industry
It's terrible to think about it. It seems that a great era has arrived. A few days ago, I discussed the phenomenon of these industries with several industry seniors. The seniors said that it was all concept interpretation, which is a good thing. It is true that the manufacturing industry has not been paid attention to for so long. I always think that the manufacturing industry is a tough field. Today, people in the industry feel flattered by so much attention.
The world is full of concepts. Various concepts are discussed in various industrial groups, including software definition PLC, software definition intelligence, software definition security, software definition network, software definition PLC, software definition manufacturing, middle office and container. Just as I learned ASP, PowerBuider, profit model, high-end and other words when I installed B in 1999, a lot of big names and experts have come into being, It also participates in the suggestions and guidance of various industrial policies.
You can look at the net profits of various enterprises. Even the roast ones of ICBC account for 35%, while the profits of those enterprises that are defined as large and leading industry benchmarks are only about 10%. Therefore, for a long time, I will feel puzzled. What do you want to see in such a thin profit industry?
When it comes to data driven enabling manufacturing, in every glittering conference room, various forums are discussing various high-end and grand topics, from which you always expect to hear directions for your future development... However, when it comes to specific "scenarios" and "applications", they are basically "block diagrams", "architectures", and some "smart for smart" scenario applications.
 
I talked a lot with Huawei's friends. They were working on many projects, and everyone was pragmatic. Even though they knew it was difficult, they threw a lot of people at it. Sometimes they thought it was just like this! Huawei may be the only one who discusses concepts and really does things.
 
What's more interesting is that I once talked with a friend in the IT industry, and I said that the scene is a bit chaotic now! How come your voice seems to be controlled by your IT circle? The person who works at the OT end seems to have no voice. What surprised me was his reaction - no! We think your OT side has a great say! It makes us all unable to do things - which makes me reflect on "obsession" - are we all trapped in obsession? Seriously think about it, we must give potential to the industrial Internet, otherwise, we are too "self-centered".
You want to empower, but you have to go through a hard process
As far as the development of the traditional manufacturing industry is concerned, it has gone through a very arduous process to today's relatively high degree of automation. Many people are trying to empower the manufacturing industry.
In order to become an industry, we have to continue to optimize for decades. For example, in the blister industry, there are many processes. There are many kinds of quality problems in these processes. We need to rely on continuous improvement to produce high-quality products.
To do something that you think is superior, you must go through the process of being forced on the manufacturing site.
It is very hard to do a good job in the manufacturing industry. People who have never been to the scene can't understand what it means to be "there are gods on the scene". You have to be there to know what characteristics the object you want to empower has? How complex is its process? How many processes are there? How many materials are there?
If you don't understand the scene, why can't you even achieve the effect of the model? I can't understand it - because the model won't tell you it's not good.
Is intelligent manufacturing advanced?
Recently, I told the school the Introduction to Intelligent Manufacturing. I hope the students ask questions in advance so that they can make targeted explanations. Unexpectedly, the students asked about 50 questions and thought that everyone was serious about asking questions or replying one by one. Now let's share them.
Q: Is the main research of intelligent manufacturing the latest scientific and technological frontier knowledge? With rapid social development, can the industry maintain its advantages for a long time? What are the advantages of intelligent manufacturing over traditional manufacturing?
Answer: Intelligent manufacturing studies how to make products better. Any technology has a historical development process. Even the most advanced manufacturing must handle materials and processes well. Intelligent manufacturing only refers to using better methods and tools, rather than manufacturing regardless of quality, cost and delivery capacity.
It has no advantage over traditional industries. It is just an upgrade of traditional manufacturing. They are not advantages, but an evolutionary relationship. Intelligent manufacturing is the evolution of traditional manufacturing. It has new features, but this is not called "advantages".
 
No matter what you do, you have to do it honestly on the spot. Looking up at the road is not often done. Being down-to-earth is what you need to do most of the time. Don't reverse the proportion of time allocation.
 
After talking for a long time, back to the theme, we really need to create in awe. Moreover, we should not stay at the concept, but take the spirit of doing things to promote its realization. We have so many things, instead of discussing the concept every day.